Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s scheduled visit to Hungary on April 2 has ignited fresh controversy, as Budapest prepares to openly defy the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) arrest warrant against him. This move underscores deep divisions within the European Union regarding international law, justice, and Israel’s actions in Gaza.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a longstanding ally of Netanyahu, condemned the ICC’s warrant as “shameful” and extended an invitation shortly after the charges were issued. The five-day visit is seen by human rights groups as a direct challenge to the ICC’s legitimacy, with Amnesty International calling it a “cynical effort to undermine the court and its work.”
Hungary’s defiance aligns with its broader pattern of challenging EU principles, including the rule of law and democratic governance. Despite being a signatory to the Rome Statute, Hungary argues that its constitution prevents it from enforcing ICC decisions, effectively shielding Netanyahu from arrest.
Beyond legal implications, the visit is expected to focus on key geopolitical issues, including U.S. policies on Gaza. Israeli media reports suggest Netanyahu and Orban will discuss former U.S. President Donald Trump’s controversial plan for the enclave, which includes displacing Palestinians and developing a Mediterranean resort—an idea widely condemned by Arab nations and at odds with the EU’s long-standing support for a two-state solution.
Netanyahu’s European engagements have also revealed inconsistencies in the EU’s approach to international law. While some member states, like Spain and Ireland, have signaled a willingness to enforce the ICC warrant, others, including Germany and France, have taken ambiguous stances. Germany’s incoming Chancellor Friedrich Merz has hinted at ways to host Netanyahu without arrest, while France has argued that heads of state from non-signatory countries cannot be detained—despite previously urging Mongolia to arrest Russian President Vladimir Putin under similar circumstances.
Hungary’s growing friction with the EU is further fueling calls for structural reforms within the bloc. Germany is reportedly pushing for the removal of consensus requirements on sanctions, a move aimed at sidelining Orban’s persistent vetoes on decisions, including those related to Ukraine. Meanwhile, discussions are underway about restricting funds and voting rights for member states that disregard EU legal norms—measures seemingly tailored for Hungary.
Despite increasing scrutiny of Israel’s military actions in Gaza and Lebanon, the EU remains hesitant to take concrete measures, such as reconsidering its free trade agreement with Israel. While the European Commission has reaffirmed its commitment to the ICC and the fight against impunity, it has stopped short of explicitly calling for Netanyahu’s arrest, further exposing the bloc’s internal contradictions.
As Netanyahu’s visit to Hungary unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the deep fractures within the EU over Israel, Palestine, and the enforcement of international law. The ongoing debate over how to handle the ICC warrant not only tests European unity but also raises broader questions about the credibility of global justice mechanisms when faced with political interests.
